SeeControl solutions for Fleet Management are ideal for complex specialty fleets and go beyond "dots on a map" to help you manage your daily performance and long-term ownership cycles with:
|
|
|
|
GPS Tracking & AVL Features. Know the current position and historical movement of your assets via GPS and RTLS positioning devices from any vendor. Use standard AVL features such as routing, landmarking, geofencing, GIS layers, trip reports and more to manage hourly activities. |
||||
|
|
|
|
Wi-Fi Communications. Gather as much data as you need via optional Wi-Fi communications that reduce cellular wireless costs. Sophisticated rules segregate data messages between cellular vs. Wi-Fi networks. |
||||
|
|
|
|
Sensors & CANBus Telematics. SeeControl can interface with thousands of sensor, equipment, CAN and JBus data points across mixed fleets. This support for deep data and complex relationships between vehicles and onboard data sources is superior to any cloud telematics offering in the market. |
||||
|
|
|
|
Work Status Monitoring. Combine location with onboard sensor and inventory data with open rules to determine actual operating hours, work time, delivery time, failure warnings and other status information for your daily business. |
||||
|
|
|
|
Predictive Maintenance. Use real-time condition data and algorithmic analysis to predict when assets might fail. Then schedule parts & technicians to avoid unplanned downtime. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance & Goal Management. Deploy tools for driver ratings, emissions analysis, replacement decisions, hours-of-service reporting, insurance risk modeling, trip reporting and virtually any form of reporting or trend analysis you currently manage with spreadsheets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High ROI & Cost-Effective. SeeControl customers have saved 25% or better across their fleet operations in fuel reductions, driver efficiency, maintenance reduction, vehicle replacement/procurement costs and availability improvements—with a solution tailored for their precise fleet objectives at a fractional investment compared to competing approaches. |